login  home  contents  what's new  discussion  bug reports     help  links  subscribe  changes  refresh  edit

Edit detail for SandBoxSymbolic revision 18 of 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Editor: Bill Page
Time: 2008/07/07 13:48:20 GMT-7
Note: Re: will be problematic

added:

From BillPage Mon Jul 7 13:48:14 -0700 2008
From: Bill Page
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:48:14 -0700
Subject: Re: will be problematic
Message-ID: <20080707134814-0700@axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org>

I agree that the type 'Union(Variable d,Integer)' alone is not
sufficient for symbolic computation. But although it might look
strange, in fact a result of 'Polynomial Integer' for '2*d' is
not really a problem. Remember that the use of 'Integer' in
'Polynomial Integer' does not mean that evaluation of the
polynomial yields an 'Integer' - it means only that the domain
of the coefficients of the polynomial are integers (i.e. that
2 is an integer), it says nothing about 'd':
\begin{axiom}
p:=2*d
eval(p,d=3.14)
\end{axiom}

But there is still a problem since I can write:
\begin{axiom}
a:Union(Variable a,Integer)
a:=3.14
p:=2*a
eval(p,a=3.14)
\end{axiom}
and Axiom does not complain about the 'eval' request because
as far as 'Polynomial Integer' is concerned 'd' is just a
Symbol.

In the case of the example 'Indeterminant' domain, evaluation
of symbolic expressions is always delayed so an appropriate
'eval' operation could be defined that properly respects the
type.

Symbolic Integers

A simple form of symbolic computation using just Variable and Integer.

fricas
(1) -> a:Union(Variable a,Integer)
Type: Void
fricas
b:Union(Variable b,Integer)
Type: Void
fricas
c:=a*3-b*2

\label{eq1}-{2 \  b}+{3 \  a}(1)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
fricas
p:UP(x,Integer):=x*2-7

\label{eq2}{2 \  x}- 7(2)
Type: UnivariatePolynomial?(x,Integer)
fricas
pc := p c

\label{eq3}-{4 \  b}+{6 \  a}- 7(3)
Type: Fraction(Polynomial(Integer))
fricas
f(x)==x^3-x^2+1
Type: Void
fricas
fb := f b
fricas
Compiling function f with type Variable(b) -> Polynomial(Integer)

\label{eq4}{{b}^{3}}-{{b}^{2}}+ 1(4)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
fricas
a:=1

\label{eq5}1(5)
Type: Union(Integer,...)
fricas
b:=-3

\label{eq6}- 3(6)
Type: Union(Integer,...)
fricas
c

\label{eq7}-{2 \  b}+{3 \  a}(7)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
fricas
eval(pc,['a=a,'b=b])

\label{eq8}11(8)
Type: Fraction(Polynomial(Integer))
fricas
eval(c,['a=a,'b=b])

\label{eq9}9(9)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
fricas
eval(fb,['a=a,'b=b])

\label{eq10}-{35}(10)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
fricas
a:=3.14  -- not permitted!
Cannot convert right-hand side of assignment 3.14
to an object of the type Union(Variable(a),Integer) of the left-hand side.

For more complex cases it is necessary to define a new domain of "indeterminants". These are symbols and unevaluated expressions that can be evaluated at a later time. This domain is modeled after InputForm? which provides all of the basic functionality.

spad
)abbrev domain INDET Indeterminant
++ Description:
++   Based on InputForm
Indeterminant():
  Join(SExpressionCategory(String,Symbol,Integer,DoubleFloat,OutputForm),
       ConvertibleTo SExpression) with
    eval: % -> Any
      ++ eval(f) passes f to the interpreter.
    binary   : (%, List %) -> %
      ++ \spad{binary(op, [a1,...,an])} returns the input form
      ++ corresponding to  \spad{a1 op a2 op ... op an}.
    function : (%, List Symbol, Symbol) -> %
      ++ \spad{function(code, [x1,...,xn], f)} returns the input form
      ++ corresponding to \spad{f(x1,...,xn) == code}.
    lambda   : (%, List Symbol) -> %
      ++ \spad{lambda(code, [x1,...,xn])} returns the input form
      ++ corresponding to \spad{(x1,...,xn) +-> code} if \spad{n > 1},
      ++ or to \spad{x1 +-> code} if \spad{n = 1}.
    "+"      : (%, %) -> %
      ++ \spad{a + b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a + b}.
    "-"      : (%, %) -> %
      ++ \spad{a - b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a - b}.
    "-"      : % -> %
      ++ \spad{-a} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{-a}.
    "*"      : (%, %) -> %
      ++ \spad{a * b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a * b}.
    "/"      : (%, %) -> %
      ++ \spad{a / b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a / b}.
    "**"     : (%, NonNegativeInteger) -> %
      ++ \spad{a ** b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a ** b}.
    "**"     : (%, Integer) -> %
      ++ \spad{a ** b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a ** b}.
    unparse  : % -> String
      ++ unparse(f) returns a string s such that the parser
      ++ would transform s to f.
      ++ Error: if f is not the parsed form of a string.
    declare  : List %   -> Symbol
      ++ declare(t) returns a name f such that f has been
      ++ declared to the interpreter to be of type t, but has
      ++ not been assigned a value yet.
      ++ Note: t should be created as \spad{devaluate(T)$Lisp} where T is the
      ++ actual type of f (this hack is required for the case where
      ++ T is a mapping type).
    compile  : (Symbol, List %) -> Symbol
      ++ \spad{compile(f, [t1,...,tn])} forces the interpreter to compile
      ++ the function f with signature \spad{(t1,...,tn) -> ?}.
      ++ returns the symbol f if successful.
      ++ Error: if f was not defined beforehand in the interpreter,
      ++ or if the ti's are not valid types, or if the compiler fails.
    coerce : Integer -> %
 == SExpression add
    Rep := SExpression
mkProperOp: Symbol -> % strsym : % -> String tuplify : List Symbol -> %
coerce(x:Integer):% == convert(x) coerce(x:%):OutputForm == expr x
convert(x:%):SExpression == x pretend SExpression
conv(ll : List %): % == convert(ll pretend List SExpression)$SExpression pretend %
lambda(f,l) == conv([convert("+->"::Symbol),tuplify l,f]$List(%))
eval x == v := interpret(x)$Lisp mkObj(unwrap(objVal(v)$Lisp)$Lisp, objMode(v)$Lisp)$Lisp
convert(x:DoubleFloat):% == convert(x)$Rep
strsym s == string? s => string s symbol? s => string symbol s error "strsym: form is neither a string or symbol"
unparse x == atom?(s:% := form2String(x)$Lisp) => strsym s concat [strsym a for a in destruct s]
declare signature == declare(name := new()$Symbol, signature)$Lisp name
compile(name, types) == symbol car cdr car selectLocalMms(mkProperOp name, convert(name)@%, types, nil$List(%))$Lisp
mkProperOp name == op := mkAtree(nme := convert(name)@%)$Lisp transferPropsToNode(nme, op)$Lisp convert op
binary(op, args) == (n := #args) < 2 => error "Need at least 2 arguments" n = 2 => convert([op, first args, last args]$List(%)) convert([op, first args, binary(op, rest args)]$List(%))
tuplify l == empty? rest l => convert first l conv concat(convert("Tuple"::Symbol), [convert x for x in l]$List(%))
function(f, l, name) == nn := convert(new(1 + #l, convert(nil()$List(%)))$List(%))@% conv([convert("DEF"::Symbol), conv(cons(convert(name)@%, [convert(x)@% for x in l])), nn, nn, f]$List(%))
s1 + s2 == conv [convert("+"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
s1 - s2 == conv [convert("-"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
_-(s1) == conv [convert("-"::Symbol), s1]$List(%)
s1 * s2 == conv [convert("*"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
s1:% ** n:Integer == conv [convert("**"::Symbol), s1, convert n]$List(%)
s1:% ** n:NonNegativeInteger == s1 ** (n::Integer)
s1 / s2 == conv [convert("/"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
spad
   Compiling FriCAS source code from file 
      /var/lib/zope2.10/instance/axiom-wiki/var/LatexWiki/7483143363411555740-25px002.spad
      using system compiler.
   INDET abbreviates domain Indeterminant 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   initializing NRLIB INDET for Indeterminant 
   compiling into NRLIB INDET 
>> System error: invalid number of arguments: 5

Symbolic Matrices

fricas
)clear all
All user variables and function definitions have been cleared.

fricas
m:Union(Indeterminant,Matrix Integer)
You cannot now use Indeterminant in the context you have it.

Questions --yixin.cao, Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:36:24 -0700 reply
In the Union(Variable a,Integer) way,

fricas
)clear all
All user variables and function definitions have been cleared.

fricas
d: Union(Variable d, Float)
Type: Void
fricas
d*2

\label{eq11}2 \  d(11)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)

will be problematic, and the assignment between symbolic integers is not allowed.

fricas
a: Union(Variable a, Integer)
Type: Void
fricas
b: Union(Variable b, Integer)
Type: Void
fricas
b:=a
a is declared as being in Union(Variable(a),Integer) but has not been given a value.

Re: will be problematic --Bill Page, Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:48:14 -0700 reply
I agree that the type Union(Variable d,Integer) alone is not sufficient for symbolic computation. But although it might look strange, in fact a result of Polynomial Integer for 2*d is not really a problem. Remember that the use of Integer in Polynomial Integer does not mean that evaluation of the polynomial yields an Integer - it means only that the domain of the coefficients of the polynomial are integers (i.e. that 2 is an integer), it says nothing about 'd':
fricas
p:=2*d

\label{eq12}2 \  d(12)
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
fricas
eval(p,d=3.14)

\label{eq13}6.28(13)
Type: Polynomial(Float)

But there is still a problem since I can write:

fricas
a:Union(Variable a,Integer)
Type: Void
fricas
a:=3.14
Cannot convert right-hand side of assignment 3.14
to an object of the type Union(Variable(a),Integer) of the left-hand side.

and Axiom does not complain about the eval request because as far as Polynomial Integer is concerned d is just a Symbol.

In the case of the example Indeterminant domain, evaluation of symbolic expressions is always delayed so an appropriate eval operation could be defined that properly respects the type.