|
|
last edited 11 years ago by test1 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 | ||
Editor: Bill Page
Time: 2008/07/07 17:02:43 GMT-7 |
||
Note: Re: Expression Float |
added:
From BillPage Mon Jul 7 17:02:43 -0700 2008
From: Bill Page
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:02:43 -0700
Subject: Re: Expression Float
Message-ID: <20080707170243-0700@axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org>
Be careful, 'Expression Float' may not be what you think it is.
In Axiom 'Expression R' is a domain constructor which extends
rational functions with coefficients in R (Fraction Polynomial R)
by adding a set of common operators, e.g. 'sin', 'sqrt', etc.
Again the appearance of 'Float' here does not say anything
specific about the result of evaluating the expression or even
the values that can be associated with it's generators. I do
not know why one might prefer 'Expression Float' over
'Polynomial Float' or even 'Polynomial Integer'.
We wish to place a restriction on the possible values that
certain symbols can take. Such symbols and expressions formed
from them certainly cannot live in a numeric domain such as
Float. Except in certain circumstances (mentioned previously)
I think a domain such as 'a:Union(Variable(a),Float)' and the
domains to which it can be coerced (such as Polynomial,
Expression, ...) does already represent such a symbolic
expressions fairly well.
But 1) What is 'Symbolic Float'? Can you give a description?
And 2) How can I express the concept of "non-zero polynomial"
in Axiom? I might use a domain that does not include zero for
example 'a:Union(Variable(a),PositiveInteger)' but there is no
general domain of 'NonZero' anything.
Symbolic Integers
A simple form of symbolic computation using just Variable and Integer.
axioma:Union(Variable a,Integer)
axiomb:Union(Variable b,Integer)
axiomc:=a*3-b*2
(1) |
axiomp:UP(x,Integer):=x*2-7
(2) |
axiompc := p c
(3) |
axiomf(x)==x^3-x^2+1
axiomfb := f b
Compiling function f with type Variable b -> Polynomial Integer
(4) |
axioma:=1
(5) |
axiomb:=-3
(6) |
axiomc
(7) |
axiomeval(pc,['a=a,'b=b])
(8) |
axiomeval(c,['a=a,'b=b])
(9) |
axiomeval(fb,['a=a,'b=b])
(10) |
axioma:=3.14 -- not permitted!Cannot convert right-hand side of assignment 3.14
to an object of the type Union(Variable a,Integer) of the left-hand side. a:='b -- not permitted!
Cannot convert right-hand side of assignment b
to an object of the type Union(Variable a,Integer) of the left-hand side.
For more complex cases it is necessary to define a new domain of "indeterminants". These are symbols and unevaluated expressions that can be evaluated at a later time. This domain is modeled after InputForm? which provides all of the basic functionality.
spad)abbrev domain INDET Indeterminant ++ Description: ++ Based on InputForm Indeterminant(): Join(SExpressionCategory(String,Symbol,Integer,DoubleFloat,OutputForm), ConvertibleTo SExpression) with eval: % -> Any ++ eval(f) passes f to the interpreter. binary : (%, List %) -> % ++ \spad{binary(op, [a1,...,an])} returns the input form ++ corresponding to \spad{a1 op a2 op ... op an}. function : (%, List Symbol, Symbol) -> % ++ \spad{function(code, [x1,...,xn], f)} returns the input form ++ corresponding to \spad{f(x1,...,xn) == code}. lambda : (%, List Symbol) -> % ++ \spad{lambda(code, [x1,...,xn])} returns the input form ++ corresponding to \spad{(x1,...,xn) +-> code} if \spad{n > 1}, ++ or to \spad{x1 +-> code} if \spad{n = 1}. "+" : (%, %) -> % ++ \spad{a + b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a + b}. "-" : (%, %) -> % ++ \spad{a - b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a - b}. "-" : % -> % ++ \spad{-a} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{-a}. "*" : (%, %) -> % ++ \spad{a * b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a * b}. "/" : (%, %) -> % ++ \spad{a / b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a / b}. "**" : (%, NonNegativeInteger) -> % ++ \spad{a ** b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a ** b}. "**" : (%, Integer) -> % ++ \spad{a ** b} returns the input form corresponding to \spad{a ** b}. unparse : % -> String ++ unparse(f) returns a string s such that the parser ++ would transform s to f. ++ Error: if f is not the parsed form of a string. declare : List % -> Symbol ++ declare(t) returns a name f such that f has been ++ declared to the interpreter to be of type t, but has ++ not been assigned a value yet. ++ Note: t should be created as \spad{devaluate(T)$Lisp} where T is the ++ actual type of f (this hack is required for the case where ++ T is a mapping type). compile : (Symbol, List %) -> Symbol ++ \spad{compile(f, [t1,...,tn])} forces the interpreter to compile ++ the function f with signature \spad{(t1,...,tn) -> ?}. ++ returns the symbol f if successful. ++ Error: if f was not defined beforehand in the interpreter, ++ or if the ti's are not valid types, or if the compiler fails. coerce : Integer -> % == SExpression add Rep := SExpressionmkProperOp: Symbol -> % strsym : % -> String tuplify : List Symbol -> %
coerce(x:Integer):% == convert(x) coerce(x:%):OutputForm == expr x
convert(x:%):SExpression == x pretend SExpression
conv(ll : List %): % == convert(ll pretend List SExpression)$SExpression pretend %
lambda(f,l) == conv([convert("+->"::Symbol),tuplify l,f]$List(%))
eval x == v := interpret(x)$Lisp mkObj(unwrap(objVal(v)$Lisp)$Lisp, objMode(v)$Lisp)$Lisp
convert(x:DoubleFloat):% == convert(x)$Rep
strsym s == string? s => string s symbol? s => string symbol s error "strsym: form is neither a string or symbol"
unparse x == atom?(s:% := form2String(x)$Lisp) => strsym s concat [strsym a for a in destruct s]
declare signature == declare(name := new()$Symbol, signature)$Lisp name
compile(name, types) == symbol car cdr car selectLocalMms(mkProperOp name, convert(name)@%, types, nil$List(%))$Lisp
mkProperOp name == op := mkAtree(nme := convert(name)@%)$Lisp transferPropsToNode(nme, op)$Lisp convert op
binary(op, args) == (n := #args) < 2 => error "Need at least 2 arguments" n = 2 => convert([op, first args, last args]$List(%)) convert([op, first args, binary(op, rest args)]$List(%))
tuplify l == empty? rest l => convert first l conv concat(convert("Tuple"::Symbol), [convert x for x in l]$List(%))
function(f, l, name) == nn := convert(new(1 + #l, convert(nil()$List(%)))$List(%))@% conv([convert("DEF"::Symbol), conv(cons(convert(name)@%, [convert(x)@% for x in l])), nn, nn, f]$List(%))
s1 + s2 == conv [convert("+"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
s1 - s2 == conv [convert("-"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
_-(s1) == conv [convert("-"::Symbol), s1]$List(%)
s1 * s2 == conv [convert("*"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
s1:% ** n:Integer == conv [convert("**"::Symbol), s1, convert n]$List(%)
s1:% ** n:NonNegativeInteger == s1 ** (n::Integer)
s1 / s2 == conv [convert("/"::Symbol), s1, s2]$List(%)
Compiling FriCAS source code from file /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/7483143363411555740-25px002.spad using old system compiler. INDET abbreviates domain Indeterminant ------------------------------------------------------------------------ initializing NRLIB INDET for Indeterminant compiling into NRLIB INDET compiling exported coerce : Integer -> $ Time: 0.04 SEC.compiling exported coerce : $ -> OutputForm Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported convert : $ -> SExpression INDET;convert;$Se;3 is replaced by x Time: 0 SEC.
compiling local conv : List $ -> $ Time: 0.10 SEC.
compiling exported lambda : ($,List Symbol) -> $ Time: 0.02 SEC.
compiling exported eval : $ -> Any Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported convert : DoubleFloat -> $ Time: 0 SEC.
compiling local strsym : $ -> String Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported unparse : $ -> String Time: 0.07 SEC.
compiling exported declare : List $ -> Symbol Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported compile : (Symbol,List $) -> Symbol Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling local mkProperOp : Symbol -> $ Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported binary : ($,List $) -> $ Time: 0.04 SEC.
compiling local tuplify : List Symbol -> $ Time: 0.08 SEC.
compiling exported function : ($,List Symbol,Symbol) -> $ Time: 0.03 SEC.
compiling exported + : ($,$) -> $ Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported - : ($,$) -> $ Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported - : $ -> $ Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported * : ($,$) -> $ Time: 0.06 SEC.
compiling exported ** : ($,Integer) -> $ Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported ** : ($,NonNegativeInteger) -> $ Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported / : ($,$) -> $ Time: 0.01 SEC.
(time taken in buildFunctor: 1)
;;; *** |Indeterminant| REDEFINED
;;; *** |Indeterminant| REDEFINED Time: 0.01 SEC.
Warnings: [1] conv: pretend$ -- should replace by @
Cumulative Statistics for Constructor Indeterminant Time: 0.51 seconds
finalizing NRLIB INDET Processing Indeterminant for Browser database: --------(eval ((Any) %))--------- --------(binary (% % (List %)))--------- --------(function (% % (List (Symbol)) (Symbol)))--------- --------(lambda (% % (List (Symbol))))--------- --------(+ (% % %))--------- --------(- (% % %))--------- --------(- (% %))--------- --------(* (% % %))--------- --------(/ (% % %))--------- --------(** (% % (NonNegativeInteger)))--------- --------(** (% % (Integer)))--------- --------(unparse ((String) %))--------- --------(declare ((Symbol) (List %)))--------- --------(compile ((Symbol) (Symbol) (List %)))--------- --->-->Indeterminant((coerce (% (Integer)))): Not documented!!!! --------constructor--------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Indeterminant is now explicitly exposed in frame initial Indeterminant will be automatically loaded when needed from /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/INDET.NRLIB/code
Symbolic Matrices
axiom)clear allAll user variables and function definitions have been cleared.
axiomm:Union(Indeterminant,Matrix Integer)
axiomn:Union(Indeterminant,Matrix Integer)
axioma:Union(Indeterminant,Integer)
axiomb:Union(Indeterminant,Integer)
axiomab:=(3*a+b)*(a-2*b)
(11) |
axioma:=1$Integer -- because 0 and 1 can be symbolic!
(12) |
axiomeval ab
(13) |
axiomb:=0$Integer
(14) |
axioma:=-10
(15) |
axiomeval ab
(16) |
axiommn1:= m*n-n*m
(17) |
axiommn2:=(m+n)*(m-n-1)
(18) |
axiomm:=matrix [[1,2],[3,4]]
(19) |
axiomn:=matrix [[-1,-2],[-3,4]]
(20) |
axiomeval mn1
(21) |
axiomeval mn2
(22) |
axiom)clear all
All user variables and function definitions have been cleared.
axiomd: Union(Variable d, Float)
axiomd*2
(23) |
will be problematic, and the assignment between symbolic integers is not allowed.
axioma: Union(Variable a, Integer)
axiomb: Union(Variable b, Integer)
I agree that the typeaxiomb:=aa is declared as being in Union(Variable a,Integer) but has not been given a value.
Union(Variable d,Integer)
alone is not
sufficient for symbolic computation. But although it might look
strange, in fact a result of Polynomial Integer
for 2*d
is
not really a problem. Remember that the use of Integer
in
Polynomial Integer
does not mean that evaluation of the
polynomial yields an Integer
- it means only that the domain
of the coefficients of the polynomial are integers (i.e. that
2 is an integer), it says nothing about 'd':
axiomp:=2*d
(24) |
axiomeval(p,d=3.14)
(25) |
But there is still a problem since I can write:
axioma:Union(Variable a,Integer)
axioma:=3.14Cannot convert right-hand side of assignment 3.14
to an object of the type Union(Variable a,Integer) of the left-hand side. p:=2*a
(26) |
axiomeval(p,a=3.14)
(27) |
and Axiom does not complain about the eval
request because
as far as Polynomial Integer
is concerned d
is just a
Symbol.
In the case of the example Indeterminant
domain, evaluation
of symbolic expressions is always delayed so an appropriate
eval
operation could be defined that properly respects the
type.
b:=a
should mean. Does it mean that Variable(b)
is to be assigned the Symbol a
? If so then I think the type should
admit this possibility. E.g.
axiomc:Union(Variable(c),Symbol)
axiomc:=a
(28) |
PS: In the light of polynomial, (2d) is a non-zero polynomial, so that it's always safe to write (1/(2d)), but it's actually non-safe to do it in the domain of float(or integer).
b:=a is meaningless, of course. But there are many scenarios
axiom)clear allAll user variables and function definitions have been cleared.
axiomi:=10
(29) |
axioma: Union(Variable a, Integer)
axiomb: Union(Variable b, Integer)
axiomb:= (i>0=>1; a)
(30) |
which is meaningful.
Expression Float
may not be what you think it is.
In Axiom Expression R
is a domain constructor which extends
rational functions with coefficients in R (Fraction Polynomial R)
by adding a set of common operators, e.g. sin
, sqrt
, etc.
Again the appearance of Float
here does not say anything
specific about the result of evaluating the expression or even
the values that can be associated with it's generators. I do
not know why one might prefer Expression Float
over
Polynomial Float
or even Polynomial Integer
.
We wish to place a restriction on the possible values that
certain symbols can take. Such symbols and expressions formed
from them certainly cannot live in a numeric domain such as
Float. Except in certain circumstances (mentioned previously)
I think a domain such as a:Union(Variable(a),Float)
and the
domains to which it can be coerced (such as Polynomial,
Expression, ...) does already represent such a symbolic
expressions fairly well.
But 1) What is Symbolic Float
? Can you give a description?
And 2) How can I express the concept of "non-zero polynomial"
in Axiom? I might use a domain that does not include zero for
example a:Union(Variable(a),PositiveInteger)
but there is no
general domain of NonZero
anything.