|
|
last edited 11 years ago by test1 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | ||
Editor: Bill Page
Time: 2008/07/21 06:49:36 GMT-7 |
||
Note: new |
changed: - Why are PositiveInteger and NonNegativeInteger defined as SubDomains of Integer? Here is an (imperfect) example of defining Integers from a more primitive domain rather than the other way around. This definition was suggested by Ralf Hemmecke in discussions at ISSAC 2008. First let's define a constructor name 'Difference'. Like 'Fraction' the representation will be pairs of some suitable type and equality will be defined by an equivalence relation on this representation. 'Integer' then can be constructed as 'Difference(CardinalNumber)' as a kind of algebraic "quotient". The point of this construction is to illustrate several problems. One is to ask why the current generation of compilers in computer algebra systems such as Axiom, e.g. Spad and Aldor, are not able to automatically convert this mathematically correct specification to an efficient implementation. Another issue is why these languages do not have some built-in support for such common algebraic constructions as "taking a quotient". In particular, there seems to be no general way of defining a "canonical representation". \begin{spad} )abbrev domain DIFF Difference Difference(T:AbelianMonoid): AbelianMonoid with _-:(%,%) -> % == add Rep == Record(neg:T, pos:T) 0 == per [0,0] 1 == per [0,1] x+y == per [rep(x).neg+rep(y).neg, rep(x).pos+rep(y).pos] x-y == per [rep(x).neg+rep(y).pos, rep(x).pos+rep(y).neg x=y == rep(x).neg+rep(y).pos = rep(x).pos+rep(y).neg -- how to define this properly? coerce(x:%):OutputForm == rep(x)::OutputForm \end{spad}
Why are PositiveInteger? and NonNegativeInteger? defined as SubDomains? of Integer? Here is an (imperfect) example of defining Integers from a more primitive domain rather than the other way around.
This definition was suggested by Ralf Hemmecke in discussions at ISSAC 2008.
First let's define a constructor name Difference
. Like Fraction
the representation will be pairs of some suitable type and equality
will be defined by an equivalence relation on this representation.
Integer
then can be constructed as Difference(CardinalNumber)
as a kind of algebraic "quotient".
The point of this construction is to illustrate several problems. One is to ask why the current generation of compilers in computer algebra systems such as Axiom, e.g. Spad and Aldor, are not able to automatically convert this mathematically correct specification to an efficient implementation. Another issue is why these languages do not have some built-in support for such common algebraic constructions as "taking a quotient". In particular, there seems to be no general way of defining a "canonical representation".
spad)abbrev domain DIFF Difference Difference(T:AbelianMonoid): AbelianMonoid with _-:(%,%) -> % == add Rep == Record(neg:T, pos:T)
0 == per [0,0] 1 == per [0,1]
x+y == per [rep(x).neg+rep(y).neg, rep(x).pos+rep(y).pos] x-y == per [rep(x).neg+rep(y).pos, rep(x).pos+rep(y).neg x=y == rep(x).neg+rep(y).pos = rep(x).pos+rep(y).neg
-- how to define this properly? coerce(x:%):OutputForm == rep(x)::OutputForm
Compiling OpenAxiom source code from file /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/5180795550171710960-25px001.spad using Spad compiler. DIFF abbreviates domain Difference ******** Boot Syntax Error detected ******** The current line is:
8> ; ^ Currently preparsed lines are:
9> x=y == rep(x).neg+rep(y).pos = rep(x).pos+rep(y).neg; 11> coerce(x:%):OutputForm == rep(x)::OutputForm)
There are no valid tokens. The prior token was
Structure of type TOKEN Byte:[Slot Type]Slot Name :Slot Value 0:SYMBOL :|neg| 8:TYPE :IDENTIFIER 16:NONBLANK :T