login  home  contents  what's new  discussion  bug reports     help  links  subscribe  changes  refresh  edit

Edit detail for SandBoxCachedFunction revision 8 of 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Editor: Bill Page
Time: 2009/10/29 10:30:49 GMT-7
Note: Caching a function with more than one argument

changed:
-for i in 1..1000 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcd(i,j)
-for i in 1..1000 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcdCached(i,j)
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcd(i,j)
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcdCached(i,j)

changed:
-for i in 1..1000 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcd(i,j)
-for i in 1..1000 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcdCached(i,j)
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcd(i,j)
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcdCached(i,j)

A generic way to define function that cache their values.

spad
)abbrev domain CACHEDF CachedFunction                                             
++ Author: Ralf Hemmecke                                                          
++ Date Created: 2009                                                             
++ Date Last Updated: Oct 27, 2009                                                
++ Basic Operations:                                                              
++ Related Domains: Table, AssociationList                                        
++ Also See:                                                                      
++ AMS Classifications:
++ Keywords:
++ Examples:
++ References:
++ Description:
++   This domain is a domain of functions with associated cache.
CachedFunction(A: SetCategory, B: SetCategory): Exports == Implementation where
    Exports ==> with
        function: % -> (A -> B)
        cachedFunction: (A -> B) -> %
        apply: (%, A) -> B
        recursiveDefine: (%, f: A -> B) -> %
Implementation ==> add
Rep := Record(cache: Table(A, B), fun: A -> B);
function(x: %): A -> B == x.fun
cachedFunction(f: A -> B): % == [empty()$Table(A, B), f]
apply(x: %, a: A): B == c := x.cache u: Union(B, "failed") := search(a, c) if u case B then u :: B else f: A -> B := x.fun c.a := f(a)
recursiveDefine(x: %, f: A -> B): % == x.fun := f; x
spad
   Compiling FriCAS source code from file 
      /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad using 
      old system compiler.
   CACHEDF abbreviates domain CachedFunction 
   processing macro definition Exports ==> -- the constructor category 
   processing macro definition Implementation ==> -- the constructor capsule 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   initializing NRLIB CACHEDF for CachedFunction 
   compiling into NRLIB CACHEDF 
   compiling exported function : $ -> A -> B
      CACHEDF;function;$M;1 is replaced by QCDR 
Time: 0.06 SEC.
compiling exported cachedFunction : A -> B -> $ Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported apply : ($,A) -> B Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported recursiveDefine : ($,A -> B) -> $ Time: 0 SEC.
(time taken in buildFunctor: 0)
;;; *** |CachedFunction| REDEFINED
;;; *** |CachedFunction| REDEFINED Time: 0.01 SEC.
Cumulative Statistics for Constructor CachedFunction Time: 0.09 seconds
finalizing NRLIB CACHEDF Processing CachedFunction for Browser database: --->-->CachedFunction((function ((Mapping B A) %))): Not documented!!!! --->-->CachedFunction((cachedFunction (% (Mapping B A)))): Not documented!!!! --->-->CachedFunction((apply (B % A))): Not documented!!!! --->-->CachedFunction((recursiveDefine (% % (Mapping B A)))): Not documented!!!! --------constructor--------- ; compiling file "/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF.lsp" (written 29 OCT 2009 10:28:10 AM): ; compiling (/VERSIONCHECK 2) ; compiling (PUT (QUOTE |CACHEDF;function;$M;1|) ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;function;$M;1| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;cachedFunction;M$;2| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;apply;$AB;3| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;recursiveDefine;$M$;4| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CachedFunction| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CachedFunction;| ...) ; compiling (MAKEPROP (QUOTE |CachedFunction|) ...)
; /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF.fasl written ; compilation finished in 0:00:00.141 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CachedFunction is now explicitly exposed in frame initial CachedFunction will be automatically loaded when needed from /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF

axiom
)set message time on
I := Integer
LatexWiki Image(1)
Type: Domain
axiom
Time: 0.01 (IN) + 0.08 (OT) = 0.09 sec
f(n:I): I ==1
Function declaration f : Integer -> Integer has been added to workspace.
Type: Void
axiom
Time: 0 sec
fib: CachedFunction(I,I) := cachedFunction(f)
axiom
Compiling function f with type Integer -> Integer 
LISP output: (#<HASH-TABLE :TEST EQUAL :COUNT 0 {10058B5391}> #<FUNCTION |*1;f;1;initial|>)
Type: CachedFunction?(Integer,Integer)
axiom
Time: 0.01 (EV) + 0.02 (OT) = 0.03 sec
recursiveDefine(fib,(n:I):I+->if n<2 then 1 else fib(n-1) + fib(n-2))
LISP output: (#<HASH-TABLE :TEST EQUAL :COUNT 0 {10058B5391}> #<FUNCTION |*1;anonymousFunction;0;initial;internal|>)
Type: CachedFunction?(Integer,Integer)
axiom
Time: 0.03 (IN) + 0.01 (OT) = 0.04 sec
fib 40
LatexWiki Image(2)
Type: PositiveInteger?
axiom
Time: 0.01 (IN) + 0.01 (OT) = 0.02 sec
g(n:I): I == if n<2 then 1 else g(n-1)+g(n-2)
Function declaration g : Integer -> Integer has been added to workspace.
Type: Void
axiom
Time: 0 sec
g 40
axiom
Compiling function g with type Integer -> Integer
LatexWiki Image(3)
Type: PositiveInteger?
axiom
Time: 13.63 (EV) + 0.01 (OT) = 13.64 sec
h: I -> I := function fib
LatexWiki Image(4)
Type: (Integer -> Integer)
axiom
Time: 0 sec
h 40
LatexWiki Image(5)
Type: PositiveInteger?
axiom
Time: 0 sec
axiom
)set message time off

Caching a function with more than one argument

We need to combine more than one domain into a single domain in a universal manner like a cross-product. There are seveal ways to do this in Axiom including List, Record, Product and DirectProduct. For example:

axiom
-- combine two domain in one using Record
Pair:=Record(x1:Integer,x2:Integer)
LatexWiki Image(6)
Type: Domain
axiom
pair(x:Integer,y:Integer):Pair == [x,y]
Function declaration pair : (Integer,Integer) -> Record(x1: Integer, x2: Integer) has been added to workspace.
Type: Void
axiom
--
gcd2(arg:Pair):Integer == gcd(arg.x1,arg.x2)
Function declaration gcd2 : Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer) -> Integer has been added to workspace.
Type: Void
axiom
gcd2cached:CachedFunction(Pair,Integer):=cachedFunction gcd2
axiom
Compiling function gcd2 with type Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer)
       -> Integer 
LISP output: (() #<FUNCTION |*1;gcd2;1;initial|>)
Type: CachedFunction?(Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer),Integer)
axiom
gcdCached(x1:Integer,x2:Integer):Integer == gcd2cached pair(x1,x2)
Function declaration gcdCached : (Integer,Integer) -> Integer has been added to workspace.
Type: Void

axiom
)set message time on
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcd(i,j)
Type: Void
axiom
Time: 0.43 (EV) = 0.43 sec
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcdCached(i,j)
axiom
Compiling function pair with type (Integer,Integer) -> Record(x1: 
      Integer,x2: Integer)
axiom
Compiling function gcdCached with type (Integer,Integer) -> Integer
Type: Void
axiom
Time: 0.01 (IN) + 6.57 (EV) + 0.01 (OT) = 6.59 sec
axiom
)set message time off

axiom
testhash() ==
  for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat
    if gcdCached(i,j)~=gcd(i,j) then error "bad hash!"
  "good"
Type: Void
axiom
testhash()
axiom
Compiling function testhash with type () -> String
LatexWiki Image(7)
Type: String

I was rather disappointed with the performance of the cache! So I took a look at the source code for Table and it seems that Table only uses an efficient hashing method if hashable(Key)$Lisp is true, where Key is the first domain of Table(Key,Entry). This is true for Integer and hashable(String)$Lisp but not Record(x1:Integer,x2:Integer) or even List(Integer).

axiom
hashable(Integer)$Lisp
LatexWiki Image(8)
Type: SExpression?
axiom
hashable(String)$Lisp
LatexWiki Image(9)
Type: SExpression?
axiom
hashable(Record(x1:Integer,x2:Integer))$Lisp
Compiled code for gcd2 has been cleared.
LatexWiki Image(10)
Type: SExpression?
axiom
hashable(List Integer)$Lisp
LatexWiki Image(11)
Type: SExpression?

But as far as I can see the implementation of List and Record in Axiom do satisfy the requirements for the use of HashTable?:

  ++   This creates a \spadtype{HashTable} if equal for the Key
  ++   domain is consistent with Lisp EQUAL otherwise an
  ++   \spadtype{AssociationList}

if their component domains do. So I think it would be a good idea to make the hashable function in 'spad.lisp':

  (defun |knownEqualPred| (dom)
    (let ((fun (|compiledLookup| '= '((|Boolean|) <img alt="LatexWiki Image" class="equation" src="images/3644510302787779389-18.0px.png" width="1" height="1"/>) dom)))
      (if fun (get (bpiname (car fun)) '|SPADreplace|)
        nil)))

  (defun |hashable| (dom)
    (memq (|knownEqualPred| dom)
          #-Lucid '(EQ EQL EQUAL)
          #+Lucid '(EQ EQL EQUAL EQUALP)
          ))

a little smarter. This test only seems to check if the compiler was able to optimize equality to a lisp operator. I suppose we could improve the compiler but even failing that, there should be a way to recognize it at this level. I think it's something like having the Canonical property "all the way down".

We can test this for now by using HashTable? explicitly and just assuming that that domain A satisfies the requirement:

spad
)abbrev domain CACHEDF CachedFunction                                             
CachedFunction(A: SetCategory, B: SetCategory): Exports == Implementation where
    Exports ==> with
        function: % -> (A -> B)
        cachedFunction: (A -> B) -> %
        apply: (%, A) -> B
        recursiveDefine: (%, f: A -> B) -> %
Implementation ==> add
Rep := Record(cache: HashTable(A, B, "UEQUAL"), fun: A -> B);
function(x: %): A -> B == x.fun
cachedFunction(f: A -> B): % == [empty()$HashTable(A, B, "UEQUAL"), f]
apply(x: %, a: A): B == c := x.cache u: Union(B, "failed") := search(a, c) if u case B then u :: B else f: A -> B := x.fun c.a := f(a)
recursiveDefine(x: %, f: A -> B): % == x.fun := f; x
spad
   Compiling FriCAS source code from file 
      /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/6894297888104578709-25px007.spad using 
      old system compiler.
   CACHEDF abbreviates domain CachedFunction 
   processing macro definition Exports ==> -- the constructor category 
   processing macro definition Implementation ==> -- the constructor capsule 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   initializing NRLIB CACHEDF for CachedFunction 
   compiling into NRLIB CACHEDF 
   compiling exported function : $ -> A -> B
      CACHEDF;function;$M;1 is replaced by QCDR 
;;; *** |CACHEDF;function;$M;1| REDEFINED Time: 0.04 SEC.
compiling exported cachedFunction : A -> B -> $
;;; *** |CACHEDF;cachedFunction;M$;2| REDEFINED Time: 0.01 SEC.
compiling exported apply : ($,A) -> B
;;; *** |CACHEDF;apply;$AB;3| REDEFINED Time: 0 SEC.
compiling exported recursiveDefine : ($,A -> B) -> $
;;; *** |CACHEDF;recursiveDefine;$M$;4| REDEFINED Time: 0 SEC.
(time taken in buildFunctor: 10)
;;; *** |CachedFunction| REDEFINED
;;; *** |CachedFunction| REDEFINED Time: 0.01 SEC.
Cumulative Statistics for Constructor CachedFunction Time: 0.06 seconds
finalizing NRLIB CACHEDF Processing CachedFunction for Browser database: --->/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad-->CachedFunction((function ((Mapping B A) %))): Not documented!!!! --->/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad-->CachedFunction((cachedFunction (% (Mapping B A)))): Not documented!!!! --->/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad-->CachedFunction((apply (B % A))): Not documented!!!! --->/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad-->CachedFunction((recursiveDefine (% % (Mapping B A)))): Not documented!!!! --->/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad-->CachedFunction(constructor): Not documented!!!! --->/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/8303643491408128431-25px001.spad-->CachedFunction(): Missing Description ; compiling file "/var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF.lsp" (written 29 OCT 2009 10:30:00 AM): ; compiling (/VERSIONCHECK 2) ; compiling (PUT (QUOTE |CACHEDF;function;$M;1|) ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;function;$M;1| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;cachedFunction;M$;2| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;apply;$AB;3| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CACHEDF;recursiveDefine;$M$;4| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CachedFunction| ...) ; compiling (DEFUN |CachedFunction;| ...) ; compiling (MAKEPROP (QUOTE |CachedFunction|) ...)
; /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF.fasl written ; compilation finished in 0:00:00.051 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CachedFunction is already explicitly exposed in frame initial CachedFunction will be automatically loaded when needed from /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF

Now let's try that again.

axiom
-- combine two domain in one
Pair:=Record(x1:Integer,x2:Integer)
LatexWiki Image(12)
Type: Domain
axiom
pair(x:Integer,y:Integer):Pair == [x,y]
Function declaration pair : (Integer,Integer) -> Record(x1: Integer, x2: Integer) has been added to workspace. Compiled code for pair has been cleared. Compiled code for gcdCached has been cleared. Compiled code for testhash has been cleared. 1 old definition(s) deleted for function or rule pair
Type: Void
axiom
--
gcd2(arg:Pair):Integer == gcd(arg.x1,arg.x2)
Function declaration gcd2 : Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer) -> Integer has been added to workspace. 1 old definition(s) deleted for function or rule gcd2
Type: Void
axiom
gcd2cached:CachedFunction(Pair,Integer):=cachedFunction gcd2
There are 30 exposed and 3 unexposed library operations named elt having 2 argument(s) but none was determined to be applicable. Use HyperDoc Browse, or issue )display op elt to learn more about the available operations. Perhaps package-calling the operation or using coercions on the arguments will allow you to apply the operation. Cannot find a definition or applicable library operation named elt with argument type(s) Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer) Integer
Perhaps you should use "@" to indicate the required return type, or "$" to specify which version of the function you need. FriCAS will attempt to step through and interpret the code.
axiom
Compiling function gcd2 with type Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer)
       -> Integer 
LISP output: (#<HASH-TABLE :TEST EQUAL :COUNT 0 {100572D591}> #<FUNCTION #:G11004>)
Type: CachedFunction?(Record(x1: Integer,x2: Integer),Integer)
axiom
gcdCached(x1:Integer,x2:Integer):Integer == gcd2cached pair(x1,x2)
Function declaration gcdCached : (Integer,Integer) -> Integer has been added to workspace. 1 old definition(s) deleted for function or rule gcdCached
Type: Void

axiom
)set message time on
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcd(i,j)
Type: Void
axiom
Time: 0.01 (IN) + 0.53 (EV) = 0.54 sec
for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat gcdCached(i,j)
axiom
Compiling function pair with type (Integer,Integer) -> Record(x1: 
      Integer,x2: Integer)
axiom
Compiling function gcdCached with type (Integer,Integer) -> Integer 
x1 is declared as being in Integer but has not been given a value.
axiom
)set message time off

axiom
testhash() ==
  for i in 1..100 repeat for j in 1..100 repeat
    if gcdCached(i,j)~=gcd(i,j) then error "bad hash!"
  "good"
1 old definition(s) deleted for function or rule testhash
Type: Void
axiom
testhash()
axiom
Compiling function testhash with type () -> String 
x1 is declared as being in Integer but has not been given a value.

perhaps recursiveDefine not necessary --Bill Page, Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:06:18 -0700 reply
axiom
)set message time on
axiom
)lib CACHEDF
CachedFunction is already explicitly exposed in frame initial CachedFunction will be automatically loaded when needed from /var/zope2/var/LatexWiki/CACHEDF.NRLIB/CACHEDF fib2: CachedFunction(INT,INT):= cachedFunction (n+-> if n<2 then 1 else fib2(n-1)+fib2(n-2) )
LISP output: (#<HASH-TABLE :TEST EQUAL :COUNT 0 {1005545A21}> #<FUNCTION |*1;anonymousFunction;1;initial;internal|>)
Type: CachedFunction?(Integer,Integer)
axiom
Time: 0.01 (EV) + 0.01 (OT) = 0.02 sec
fib2 40
LatexWiki Image(13)
Type: PositiveInteger?
axiom
Time: 0 sec

Looks like the time difference (if any) is not significant.